(Note: This post is United Methodist-centric. If United Methodism isn't your tribe, or if you have no interest in our current situation, feel free to disregard this one and enjoy a lovely winter day.)
As you’re aware, the UMC is in conversation about splitting
over matters regarding sexual orientation, in particular marriage and
ordination. General Conference 2020 was going to iron out the details, enabling
churches to move ahead in their preferred direction. The working assumption is
that the moderate/progressive UMs will retain custody of “The United Methodist
Church” and all its workings, and the conservatives will move into a new
denomination of their creation, “The Global Methodist Church.” A
highly-negotiated plan, The Protocol, had been ironed out by key parties and
was holding together by a thread coming into General Conference 2020.
And then COVID. General Conference 2020 was rescheduled to
2021 and now re-rescheduled to 2022, and it’s not looking good for the
September 2022 date.
Why does COVID have power to stall the UMC? The only body
that can make these decisions about separation is the General Conference, a
gathering of delegates from around the world. In addition to the normal barriers to large
gatherings that have been and still are in place, over 40% of our General
Conference delegates come from outside the US, many from nations in Africa and elsewhere
with scant access to the vaccine. Although great minds around the world have
tried to come up with various solutions to allow us to actually hold General
Conference, limitations imposed by a worldwide pandemic and our UM Book of
Discipline continue to prevent us from holding General Conference.
We are hamstrung by our own rules. And we can’t change the rules that
are keeping us from gathering until we are able to gather in person to
change the rules.
So, what’s been happening in United Methodism while we’re
all stuck in this interminable holding pattern? The answer is both that nothing
is happening, and that a great deal is happening.
On the “nothing is happening” side of things, the restrictive,
punitive rules of General Conference 2019 remain in place. There is no
agreed-upon plan for separation.
On the “a great deal is happening” side of things, churches
and clergy on both sides are increasingly tired of waiting. Some progressives,
both clergy and churches, have been living as if we are already a renewed, progressive
denomination. Some conservatives, both clergy and churches, have begun to break
away. It is a messy, liminal time in which we
are COVID-trapped together for the duration.
In short, we are like a couple that has decided to divorce
but is stuck living in the same house. It is not easy, and it is often not
pretty.
In Missouri, there have been some developments that have
warranted a response from our bishop. There are a few sizeable traditionalist churches
in Missouri that are choosing to break away, to “disaffiliate,” even before
General Conference has been able to meet to hash out the separation. The UMC
and the Missouri Annual Conference have established guidelines for this process
for churches that want to leave now, intended to create equity on all sides.
One particular issue, for instance, is to insure that departing churches pay
their fair share towards the pension fund for retired pastors. Otherwise, if our
pension funds become unstable, remaining churches would have to pay more because
of churches that walked out on their pension obligation.
Unfortunately, there are churches that are choosing to act
outside of this process and, in their leaving, are leaving our retirees in the
lurch. Their actions necessitate a response from the Missouri Conference. If
you’d like to know more, read the attachments to this email.
I’m grateful that Bishop Farr and the Conference are doing
the hard work of accountability with these clergy and churches. Their strong
response is helping to protect our retired clergy and all of the churches in
the Missouri Conference. Because they are taking on this role so ably, I am
freed from the burden of having to express outrage or indignation, although I confess
to the occasional eye roll. My most righteous of indignations wouldn’t do
anything to affect the reality of the situation, and it would only serve to
steal a little light from my own soul on this already-gloomy winter day.
So, I am choosing to trust the system and to spend my time
and energy working and praying for grace.
It’s not news that divorce is messy. After all, if things
were good between the two sides, there wouldn’t be need for a divorce, would
there? These deep divisions within the United Methodist part of Christ’s body
seem to be leading inevitably to separation. We didn’t choose these
circumstances, yet we can choose our response to the circumstances.
I hope you’ll join me in praying for one another, even folks
who are choosing to leave our UM family. Pray for our bishop and Conference
leadership as they navigate the legal complexities of this situation on our
behalf. Pray for those of us who are staying within the UMC, that grace may be
the defining characteristic of our renewed denomination.
As we work to re-create a denomination based upon grace, may
the very same grace that we dream be lived out in our own grace-full actions in
these moments.
(Okay, and maybe with an occasional eye-roll.)
Read Bishop Farr's letter here. Read FAQs on Disaffiliation in Missouri here